- #Cheap 4k video card for htpc 1080p#
- #Cheap 4k video card for htpc full#
- #Cheap 4k video card for htpc tv#
Intel's upcoming Kaby Lake-G with Vega M graphics is certainly one way of doing things, with a 4GB HBM2 stack on the package, but the cost for those chips is likely going to be over three times the price of the 2200G. Dual-channel DDR4-3200 can manage about 64GB/s, a chunk of which goes to the CPU, whereas even a modest GTX 1050 has about twice that much dedicated bandwidth. While it's theoretically possible to have an APU with two or three times the GPU cores as the 2200G (Ryzen 7 2700G with Vega 24, anyone?), graphics processing tends to be extremely bandwidth hungry.
The chief problem is the need to share both power and memory bandwidth with the CPU. The difficulty with integrated graphics isn't something that's going to go away in the immediate future, at least not without increasing the cost. Lighter fare is even better, so CS:GO for example easily runs at more than 60fps average (though periodic stutters and dips below 30fps are still present for some reason).
#Cheap 4k video card for htpc 1080p#
Neither solution is going to handle the latest games at higher quality settings and 1080p or higher resolutions, but I did some additional 1080p low testing and the 2200G gets above 30fps in the majority of games. The 2200G is also more than twice as fast as Intel's latest HD Graphics 630. Again, definitely don't go with the cheapest RAM you can find if you're hoping to get the most of the integrated GPU. On the gaming side of things, the 2200G with high-end RAM is slightly faster than a 2400G with budget RAM. That's a great tradeoff for an extreme budget build. It ends up a bit slower than the 2400G across nearly all tests, but then it also costs about a third less. The stock specs include a 3.5 to 3.7GHz 4-core/4-thread CPU (losing the SMT functionality), 4MB of 元 cache, and integrated Vega 8 graphics-that's eight CUs, or 512 streaming processors. I covered the main design aspects of the Ryzen APUs in the 2400G article, so I'm mostly going to focus on the performance and value proposition of the 2200G here. The Ryzen 3 2200G has no such problems, however, with a price of only $100 and performance that's more than acceptable for light gaming and other workloads.
#Cheap 4k video card for htpc full#
Combined with the need for higher performance DDR4 memory to reach its full potential, I don't think it's the budget APU most users will want. It's a bit slower on the CPU side than a Core i3-8100, and the graphics are a bit slower than a GT 1030 (give or take depending on the game). My biggest complaint with the 2400G is that it ends up being priced a bit too high to really hit the sweet spot I was hoping for. I use HDMI from the mobo so basically video comes from the APU – obviously this will never drive 4K.I reviewed the Ryzen 5 2400G earlier this week, and I included results for the Ryzen 3 2200G as well. Now my CPU is the AMD APU Athlon 5350 and it sits on a MSI AM1I AMD Mini ITX Motherboard.
4k video is out of the question – the video just stutters and is unwatchable.
#Cheap 4k video card for htpc tv#
We had a 1080p TV before this one and that TV worked fine my our HTPC. I presuming that the APU is sluggish is trying to get a picture to the TV. If I delay the audio in VLC by 400ms it usually works. However whenever we play 1080p content the audio is out of sync with the video. While I was hoping my APU could handle it I wasn’t too optimistic.Īnyway when I connect my computer to my new TV (over HDMI) the screen/mouse is a little laggy, it’s not too bad but could be better, the slight mouse lag is tolerable. However in the last black Friday sales we got a new 49inch LG 4K Smart TV. So I built my HTPC 3 years ago and it has been great – a little trooper.